12.08.2009
Great Color Correction Tutorial
http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/cc_legal_fcp4.html
12.03.2009
Multicam Madness (creative cow)
Here's a tutorial for setting up a multicam edit-- good for general FCP knowledge. Many other tutorials available on youtube.
10.21.2009
visiting a foley stage with Conan O'brien
10.19.2009
throat singing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd3KsL9oIOg&feature=PlayList&p=39FF344EF6CB1FEE&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=41
here is one traditional throat singing example... it is used in a few different cultures... they are all slightly different so enjoy the related links too! :]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCLZMzDq5HQ&feature=related
~Sarah
Chris Hill - Yuganaut at Krannert Art Museum
10.05.2009
Javier - Current Link Gallery Display
Javier - Thoughts on Mendi + Keith Obadike
As stated the artists were Mendi + Keith Obadike. This event was part lecture and part performance.
They began with some sort of quiz on sheet of paper. They collected it afterwards and said we could check our scores on their website. I was a tad bit late so I didn't hear what their intention for the quiz was. It was a multiple choice quiz with what seemed to be random questions since most of the questions had no direct relation to each other. But I thought the quiz was thought provoking. Some of the questions had answers that were all as valid so it made me wonder more about what this quiz was for.
After this they presented a brief history of past projects. Many of them looked interesting and it was a bummer that the audience at this event couldn't partake directly in them as some had physical set ups that were not there. I specifically would have liked to play the video game with the fox and the dog. Also the project about making your own spam email. These seemed more interesting to me and I suppose its because there is something to interact with.
The performance at this event was in the way of song/reading and visuals on screen. The first performance was a preview from Four electric Ghosts since it wasn't the full stage setting. This project seems very much like a play because of the presentation of it. I thought that the songs even had more of a musical quality rather than what we define as artistic performance. But from the images they showed I do get a sense of performance art in the full presentation. There are lights, stages,and actors but I'm sure there is performative dance in it.
The other songs came from a different project. This one definitely seemed much more like artistic performance reading and that is because her delivery was not as musical. She didn't sing but read instead. The intentional randomness of the performance also adds to the artistic quality.
Overall I was satisfied with the duration and style of the event. But I would have liked to see more installation based presentation as well. And it would have been cool if some of the performers from Four Electric Ghosts were there to perform some of the dances.
Mendi + Keith Obadike
9.28.2009
Hysterical Alphabet
the hysterical alphabet-Sean O'Leary
Before seeing The Hysterical Alphabet, I had never been to a multi-media performance let alone have any idea of what to expect. Overall I would have to say that I enjoyed watching the performance even though it took me awhile to realize what the subject matter was, but whether I understood the material or not, I thought that the information was displayed in a very creative way by combining different mediums. I also really liked hearing about how the performance had been constructed from all the way from its inception to the final product.
One aspect of the performance that I really liked was how it started with the beginning of the alphabet alongside with the first theories of hysteria and then chronologically going through the alphabet and the history of hysteria. One thing that caught my attention was when the performers were talking with the audience and Terri mentioned how certain parts of the performance had just fallen into place such as getting to the letter V for Vienna and Freud. In some of my previous projects, I too felt that some things just fell into the right place at the right time event though I had not planned for it to happen that way. Another thing that stood out for me was how the project started with Terri’s research and then it branched out and added Corbett’s audio and then later Danny and his video. After seeing the performance I would have to say that after learning about the theories of montage and working on our montage projects, Danny’s video gave the performance a whole new dimension to work with along with being a performance rather than just a video to watch. I really liked how Danny was able to pull all sorts of stock footage and make a comprehendible video from it all. Danny’s work kind of reminded me of Ed Wood where he would be able to create stories and make films if not solely based on stock footage then primarily based on stock footage.
Hysterical Alphabet [JP]
Maybe this was my problem with this performance. Its use of multimedia was different than my other experiences with multimedia performances because the focus was on the combination of the words, images and sounds -- with the core of the performance being the text. In my other experiences with multimedia performances the core has always been the music, at least in my perception. It's not that I thought the music part of Hysterical wasn't used well; perhaps I had too high of expectations for more development in that realm.
My unfamiliarity with the text is probably the main reason I had difficulty understanding the performance. I felt bad, because I knew that these people had put forth a lot of effort to perform, but my confusion almost led me to ask, "What's the point?" I believe that the performance was very intriguing; I just wish that a more detailed history of hysteria were spelled out in a program.
Hysterical Alphabet - Erin Gillman
I appreciate the vast range of mixed media and the obvious time and effort put into the project. The speakers were able to create a montage between spoken, seen and heard. The images were lovely and managed to convey the humor of the Hysterical Alphabet, but the overarching idea of the piece was over my head. Perhaps if I had researched a little before I would have better enjoyed the performance.
I also got sick around the letter "q" and had to leave. You win some, you lose some.
Hysterical Alphabet, sarah christolini
The montage of the images from so many different sources really complimented each other. The relationships created between so many different images were really spectacular. I cannot even imagine how long it took to compile just the video part of this performance.
Although the video and sound of the performance were awesome- my favorite part was message and historical aspect of the performance. I found it was a fascinating commentary on gender and medicine. I hope that it exposed people who maybe weren’t previously concerned with gendered issues, to the importance and history of gendered issues. Because I was previously interested in gender studies- I found this performance captivating. I’m very glad I went to this performance and had this experience.
9.27.2009
Allison Van Pelt
by Jennifer Wild
This talk went completely over my head, but as my French Cinema professor explained later (she was hosting the talk in her classroom) it went over many scholar's heads as well so that made me feel a bit better. Because of that however I feel like I really missed out on the point of the talk. Going in expecting a talk on cinema theory I was surprised to be lectured on a volcano eruption and the "sublime." However that seemed to be the most important points of the lecture, Jean Epstein's experience with a volcano, and his film about it, "Eruption de L'Etna en 1923" (which is lost). He talks about the volcano taking on a human face and how he wants to overcome natures natural romanticism and be more focused on the technology, which I didn't quite understand. He was also focused on Walter Moore Coleman an American psychologist(?) He also concentrated on close ups in American cinema, the face in cinema and the volcano's face. And how the volcano and cinema's views are a force at a distance. She also briefly discussed telepathy but I missed what that had to do with her talk. As I said I was really lost for most of the talk so I expect my summary to confusing in itself.
"The Hysterical Alphabet: A Multi Media History"
by Terry Kapsalis
Being already interested in the history of "hysteria" I found this performance especially engaging. I loved the way they combined live reading and sound with pre-recorded reading and edited film. The combination of live and nonlive media was surprising at first but is what led to me to be further engaged. One of my favorite parts was seeing the artists interacting with the equipment live and reacting to the film and timing in front of the audience. And them playing with recording things and when to do it live kept the performance fresh in it's length. Other parts I loved was her reading voice as well as the edited film. The scenes chosen as well as how they were edited were especially affective in describing each woman. Each shot was interesting in it's own (he did a wonderful job picking scenes, but I also heard he has a fantastic memory when it comes to cinema and is able to pick out plenty of scenes off the top of his head), but the way he used repetition as well as flipping the shots emphasized each girl's story. The sound was one of the most surprising aspects. Many of the sound was unexpected, and mostly bizarre but it kept the play between audio and visual complicated. (I also heard that he played upon using the instruments live, letting the needle hit records randomly instead of picking exact points).
I had the wonderful opportunity of being able to talk to Terry Kapsalis after the performance as well and bought her book. She talked about in performance how she has a want of hiding which is why she enjoyed reading behind a table instead of using her body in they way she had done when she was younger. And I agree it's definitely a different type of performance with connections more to story telling then performances that are more forceful and use their bodies to express feelings. She also explained the hand gestures above each page number in her book, apparently doctors had come up with a series of hand gestures that described or were the supposed hand gestures of "hysterical" women. They are beautiful and a lovely small addition to the book.
The Hysterical Alphabet - Alexis Kikoen
I would really love to know Terri's creative process throughout this entire production. Where her inspiration came from, how she got ideas for the film and photographs and music. The most interesting thing to me about this production is how inspiring it is. I love that Terri had this kind of off-the-wall idea for a production, and now several years later it's finally turned into her vision. (Or pretty close to it, i imagine.) I would love to attend more multi-media productions like this one in the future.
Historical Alphabet - Chris Hill
Alphabet Hysteria
Chris Hill
The Hysterical Alphabet was a very unique and captivating experience. I initially appreciated the approach Terri Kapsalis and company took in juxtaposing real time performance with recorded multi-media. I respected the playful feel of the alphabet format while addressing graphic medical accounts that had me questioning the history of gender identities and stereotypes through the lends of a historian. I was absolutely enchanted by the voice of Terri Kapsalis and fully agree with her decision to perform the majority of the piece live, and also enjoyed the dynamic quality of layering her recorded voice with live vocals to emphasize and draw interest at one point in the performance. Her soothing voice with the vintage film gave the performance a timeless quality that was effective in giving the viewer a sense of the past. The Hysterical Alphabet was rich with metric montage and rhythmic montage, but seemed to be most concerned with tonal montage. I thought it was interesting how she used the alphabet like a time line starting in ancient Egypt with ‘A’ and leading up to a more contemporary time period with the letter ‘Z’. The Hysterical Alphabet had me thinking about how the history of hysteria as a “white woman’s disease” influences our contemporary notions about women and sickness.
I thought it was interesting hearing Kapsalis explain the development of this particular performance. She said it evolved over the past decade from just text, to text and sound, and finally included video montage. I think it is unique that every performance is different and enjoyed the experiential quality this performance lent to the audience by including some slight improvisation.
9.24.2009
hysterical alphabet-Meagan Havlik
I really enjoyed the video clips that were chosen, i think they went well with the theme,images of what is said to be a healthy woman (wonderwoman, busty 30s/40s/50s actresses). The part i think i didnt really like were the sound effects made with the instruments, it reminded me of something from elementary school.
She wasnt mentioned in the presentation but this was my personal favorite "hysteric"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_James
Has anyone read these books or know about Alice James?
9.23.2009
2 reflections / aleia murawski
the hysterical alphabet:
Kapsalis explained that the project became a six year process of looking at and reading from historical and medical text. Most of the information, being true, was shocking and uncomfortable; however, the presenters did an excellent job at making it digestable and playful. I instantly found the collaboration to be extremely interesting, especially that it was a project initially between just Kapsalis and Corbett, and then it was later extended toward Danny, who supplied the visual element. It is an interesting collaboration to go from her originally responding to text, John responding to her writing, and then Danny responding to their project together.
My immediate reaction to the event was that the presentation was really well-constructed. In contrast to earlier lectures I have attended this year, it was organized and captivating. From the beginning, when they turned on their lights and turned down the rest of lights, they commanded our attention in a respectful manner.
I was immediately impressed by the narration. Kapsalis's voice is the prefect amount of dark, humor, and intensity. Her writing was also both playful and critical. She carried the audience well from one letter to the next, and there were really nice moments of added drama through unexpected narration (either on its own or paired to imagery) and moments of pausing and recollection (which offered a nice disruption to the linear quality of moving through A to Z).
I had two favorite moments. One was when she said 'so many rising wombs back then" against the montage of hot air balloons. This is just one example of when I found the media and the language to really complement each other. My other favorite part was when she was referring to two letters, or characters, specifically. It was the part about the neighbor hysterics, and she said something like "and one day they were soon to be reunited again as neighbors." I thought visual here was especially striking, because it took me a moment to understand what was being abstracted by all of the light and smoke, and then to see two figures hanged was quite terrifying. I really appreciated these moments when the text and visual responded to each other, at times simultaneously, and other times working as variables that were answering each other.
This presentation had a really great layering effect as well. I thought the visual layering in the film was effective, along with the layering of audio (both analog and digital) as well as this recorded and live-performance layering. It helped elevate the drama and keep the audience more involved in the show. I agreed with the quote at the end that, this intent to keep it both recorded and live made it more about the performance to be included in and less about being a film or something to just watch.
the material of distance
Jean Epstein's early film theory
modern aesthetic experience:
I found this lecture to be quite scholarly, to a degree that made me appreciate the speaker's dense knowledge of the subject, yet, also made me feel incredibly disconnected. It was a really well-informed lecture; however, the speaker used so many direct literary references and quotations from Epstein's work, and since I had no introduction to his work or methodology before his presentation, I was lost immediately into this lecture.
This was presentation was centered around Jean Epstein's film theory based off of his work "Le Cinematographe de L'Etna." This document was about being the process of work being seen, not read, emphasizing on the significance of "sight." This made me think about the kino-eye or our conversations in class about montage... It is about the significance of looking and positioning moments. Epstein, specifically, is concerned about moments of magnituted and distance, the perceiver and the perceived, and "theory of close-up" (atoms of images delivered with particular force). He also had an interest in taking the subconscious and using that towards making quantifiable tests. I had a difficult time relating this back to his thesis, but my attempt at the material is that he studies Etna because, other than it being a spectacle as imagination, it represents specific cultural mythology that he wanted to explore. He uses cinema to overcome the sublime and uses technology as a mediation of distance. I thought the presentation was interesting; nevertheless, I struggled to follow it. Other than his consciousness of modern experience delivered by the technological and his rejection of romanticism, I felt like my mind was exploding like a volcano the entire time.